top of page

UConn Since 2006

Dr Martin Cherniack from the University of Connecticut Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine led an effort as the Principal Investigator to research and develop a workplace participatory program with the CT Department of Correction. 

​

The current HITEC program is the product of years of research and participation from correction staff, administration and union representatives. It has received recognition of excellence from prominent organizations including the U.S. Surgeon General. Nationally and Internationally, it is gaining attention from other correctional institutions. In the article below, Dr Cherniack introduces the phases of the research based on periods of NIOSH funding. The State of CT legislature recognized these successes and supported continuing the program.

uconn-wordmark-stacked-black_edited.png
Health Improvement Through Employee Control for Correction Personnel

Primary Investigator: Martin Cherniack MD, MPH

Correctional officers have been a relatively understudied working population, but they are an important segment of the public safety workforce. Their job tasks, while often sedentary, are psychologically stressful and interspersed with emergency responses that often produce injuries. Working third shift and frequent mandatory overtime are common requirements, especially for new officers. There is an urgent need for evidence-based interventions to improve correctional officer safety, health and well-being.

The HITEC I and HITEC II studies of CPH-NEW (2006-2016) helped to establish national recognition of these issues and their health risks, using a NIOSH Total Worker Health® perspective. HITEC III (2016-2021) featured participatory Design Teams of supervisors, corrections officers, and correctional healthcare workers, who were charged with designing, implementing, and evaluating interventions. They were successful at sustaining interventions in physical space redesign, mental health training, and structured stress reduction spaces and practices. HITEC has become a national model for best practices in supporting the health of corrections staff.

In September 2021, the State of Connecticut legislature assumed funding responsibilities for the HITEC program. Many of the established investigators from UConn, UConn Health, and UMass Lowell (UML) remain with the program.

HITEC IV continues as a model Total Worker Health® (TWH) program, continuing the research-to-practice pathway to sustainability, and advancing the promising interventions from HITEC III. Initiatives include the development of training programs for senior administrators, who often have limited experience with workforce-generated initiatives, and are in frequent transition. HITEC IV sponsored revisions of the CPH-NEW Healthy Workplace Participatory Program (HWPP) tools, to customize evaluation surveys, procedures, and process measures for use by trained lay personnel. HTIEC IV will maintain and promote bargaining unit engagement as a core component of participatory action. Investigators will study program effectiveness, and how best to scale the programs to full implementation in all CT Department of Corrections facilities.

Since 2006, many research articles have been published, trainings developed, and toolkits prepared. The Connecticut Department of Correction, both management and bargaining unit representatives, have shared HITEC results with national audiences of researchers and practitioners. The Connecticut Department of Correction is recognized as a national leader in implementing NIOSH Total Worker Health strategies in correctional facilities.

​

For more information on the scientific research.




 

For a closer look at the research, read the published article on HITEC's history

A 16-Year Chronicle of Developing a Healthy Workplace Participatory Program for Total Worker Health® in the Connecticut Department of Correction: The Health Improvement through Employee Control (HITEC) Program

Cherniack M, Namazi S, Brennan M, Henning R, Dugan A, El Ghaziri M.

(2024) International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.  21(2):142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21020142

bottom of page